Items
| No. |
Item |
119. |
Minutes
To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting
(these are circulated separately)
Minutes:
|
120. |
Apologies for absence
To receive any apologies for absence
Minutes:
Apologies of absence were received from Councillors Bateman,
Matthews, Ritchie and Whitman.
Councillor Mills substituted on behalf of Councillor
Ritchie.
|
121. |
Declarations of Interest
To receive any declarations of
interest
A member
with a disclosable pecuniary interest or a personal interest in a
matter who attends
a
meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered
-
(i)
must disclose the interest at the start of the
meeting or when the interest
becomes apparent and, if the interest is a
disclosable pecuniary interest, or a personal
interest which is also prejudicial
(ii)
may not participate in any discussion or vote on the
matter (and must withdraw
to the
public seating area) unless they have been granted a
dispensation.
A
member who discloses at a meeting a disclosable pecuniary interest
which is not registered in the Members’ Register of
Interests, or is not the subject of a pending notification, must
notify the Monitoring Officer of the interest within 28 days of the
disclosure.
Disclosable pecuniary interests, personal and prejudicial
interests are defined in Part 2 of the Code of Conduct For
Members
[If a
member is in any doubt as to whether they have an interest which
should be declared they
should
seek the advice of the Monitoring Officer before the start of the
meeting]
It is requested that Members
declare their interest at the beginning of the relevant agenda item
and it will be noted by the Committee Clerk for inclusion in the
minutes.
Minutes:
Councillor Guest asked Members
to remember to declare any Disclosable Pecuniary or other Interests
at the beginning of the relevant planning application.
|
122. |
Public Participation
An
opportunity for members of the public to make statements or ask
questions in accordance with the rules as to public
participation.
|
Time per speaker
|
Total Time
Available
|
How to let
us know
|
When we
need to know by
|
|
3
minutes
|
Where more than 1 person wishes to speak on a planning
application, the shared time is increased from 3 minutes to 5
minutes.
|
In
writing or by phone
|
Noon the day of the meeting
|
You
need to inform the council in advance if you wish to speak by
contacting Member Support on Tel: 01442 228221 or by email:
Member.support@dacorum.gov.uk
Please note the Development Management Committee will finish at
10.30pm and any unheard applications will be deferred to the next
meeting.
There are limits on how much of each meeting can be taken up
with people having their say and how long each person can speak
for. The permitted times are specified
in the table above and are allocated for each of the following on a
'first come, first served basis':
·
Town/Parish Council and Neighbourhood
Associations;
·
Objectors to an application;
·
Supporters of the application.
Every person must, when invited to do so, address their
statement or question to the Chairman of the Committee.
Every person
must after making a statement or asking a question take their seat
to listen to the reply or if they wish join the public for the rest
of the meeting or leave the meeting.
The questioner may not
ask the same or a similar question within a six month period except
for the following circumstances:
(a)
deferred planning applications which have foregone a
significant or material change since originally being
considered
(b)
resubmitted planning applications which have
foregone a significant or material change
(c)
any issues which are resubmitted to Committee in view of further
facts or information to be considered.
At a
meeting of the Development Management Committee, a person, or their
representative, may speak on a particular planning application,
provided that it is on the agenda to be considered at the
meeting.
Minutes:
Councillor Guest reminded the
members and the public about the rules regarding public
participation.
The order of the agenda was
changed to allow for those applications with public speaking to be
heard first. The items are minuted in the order they were
heard
|
123. |
4/01804/17/FUL - TWO STOREY, SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION, FRONT AND REAR DORMER TO EXISTING DWELLING. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 4 BED DWELLING ADJACENT TO EXISTING DWELLING - 17 CHESNUT DRIVE, BERKHAMSTED, HP4 2JL  PDF 518 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
B Curtain introduced the item
and said it had been referred to committee due to the contrary
views of Berkhamsted Town Council.
It was proposed by Councillor
Birnie and seconded by Councillor C Wyatt-Lowe to grant the
application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 10
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be
GRANTED subject to the following
conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
DBC/17/6/1
DBC/17/6/2A
DBC/17/6/3A
Design and Access Statement
Application form.
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
|
3
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
constructed fully in accordance with the materials specified on the
approved drawings and application form.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory
appearance to the development in accordance with Policy CS12 of the
Core Strategy.
|
|
4
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and
Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995
(or any Order amending or re-enacting that Order with or without
modification) no development falling within the following classes
of the Order shall be carried out without the prior written
approval of the local planning authority:
Schedule 2 Part 1 Classes A
Reason: To enable the local planning
authority to retain control over the development in the interests
of safeguarding the residential and visual amenity of the
locality.
|
|
5
|
The additional dwelling hereby permitted shall not
be occupied until the arrangements for vehicle parking, shown on
Drawing No. DBC/17/6/3A shall have been provided, and they shall
not be used thereafter otherwise than for the purposes
approved.
Reason: To ensure the adequate and
satisfactory provision of off-street vehicle parking
facilities.
|
|
6
|
Pedestrian visibility splays of 2 m x 2 m shall be
provided before the new dwelling is first brought into use, and
they shall thereafter be maintained, on both sides of the entrance
to the site, within which there shall be no obstruction to
visibility between 600 mm and 2 m above the carriageway.
Reason: In the interest of highway safety;
in accordance with Policies CS8 and CS12 of the Core Strategy
(2013).
|
|
7
|
The gradient of the vehicular access shall not
exceed 1:10 for the first 5 metres into the site as measured from
the near channel edge of the adjacent carriageway.
Reason: In the interests of
the safety of persons using the access and users of the highway; in
accordance with Policies CS8 and CS12 of the Core Strategy
(2013).
Article 35;
Planning permission has been granted for this
proposal. The Council acted pro-actively through positive
engagement with the applicant during the determination process
which led to improvements to the scheme. The Council has therefore
acted ...
view the full minutes text for item 123.
|
|
124. |
4/02266/17/FHA - TWO STOREY FRONT EXTENSION, SINGLE STOREY FRONT/SIDE EXTENSION, TWO STOREY REAR EXTENSION, RE-TILING OF EXISTING ROOFS AND CHANGES TO EXTERNAL FINISHES AT THE REAR - 33 STATION ROAD, TRING, HP23 5NW PDF 172 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
B
Curtain introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee to the contrary views of Tring Town Council.
It
was proposed by Councillor P Hearn and seconded by Councillor
Conway to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 10
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To comply with the requirements of
Section 91 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended
by Section 51 (1) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
2004.
|
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
constructed in accordance with the materials specified on the
approved drawings and documents.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory
appearance to the development in accordance with Policy CS12 of the
Core Strategy.
|
|
3
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and
Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995
(or any Order amending or re-enacting that Order with or without
modification) no development falling within the following classes
of the Order shall be carried out without the prior written
approval of the local planning authority:
Schedule 2 Part 1 Classes B
Reason: To enable the local planning
authority to retain control over the development in the interests
of safeguarding the residential and visual amenity of the
locality.
|
|
4
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
001 Rev 00 - Existing plans and
elevations
002 Rev 00 - Proposed plans and
elevations
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
Article 35:
Planning permission has been granted for this proposal. The
Council acted pro-actively through early engagement with the
applicant at the pre-application stage which lead to improvements
to the scheme. The Council has therefore acted pro-actively in line
with the requirements of the Framework (paragraphs 186 and 187) and
in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Development
Management Procedure) (England) (Amendment No. 2) Order
2015.
|
|
125. |
4/01547/17/FHA - CAR PORT - ELM COTTAGE, CHAPEL CROFT, CHIPPERFIELD, KINGS LANGLEY, WD4 9EQ PDF 812 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
J
Gardner introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee due to the contrary views of Chipperfield Parish
Council.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor C
Wyatt-Lowe to grant the application in line with the
officer’s recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 1
Abstained: 0
Resolved
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall not be
retained other than in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
1910-01
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
|
2
|
Within two months of the date of this decision the
timber beams, cross members and metal posts shall be painted in
dark brown colour.
Reason: To ensure that the development is
not visually prominent and satisfactorily integrates into the
street scene, in accordance with Policies CS11 and CS12 of the Core
Strategy.
Article 35
Statement
Planning permission has been granted for this proposal.
Discussion with the applicant to seek an acceptable solution was
not necessary in this instance. The Council has therefore acted
pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework
(paragraphs 186 and 187) and in accordance with the Town and
Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
(Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
|
|
126. |
4/02557/16/FUL - CHANGE OF USE OF HOME WORKSHOP TO THREE BED DWELLING - THE LAURELS, SHENDISH DRIVE LEADING FROM LONDON ROAD, SHENDISH, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 0AA PDF 397 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
R
Marber introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee due to the contrary views of Kings Langley Parish
Council.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor P
Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 8
Against: 2
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
No construction works (excluding groundworks) shall
take place until full details of both hard and soft landscape works
shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. These details shall
include:
·
hard surfacing materials and their
location;
·
means of enclosure within or around the approved
residential curtilage;
·
soft landscape works following removal of
outbuilding which shall include planting plans; written
specifications (including cultivation and other operations
associated with plant and grass establishment); schedules of
plants, noting species, plant sizes and proposed numbers/densities
where appropriate;
·
trees to be retained and measures for their
protection during construction works;
·
proposed finished levels or
contours;
·
car parking layouts and other vehicle and
pedestrian access and circulation areas.
The approved landscape works shall be carried out
prior to the first occupation of the development hereby
permitted.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development and to
safeguard the visual character of the immediate area and the
openness of the Green Belt in accordance with Policy CS5 of the
Dacorum Core Strategy 2013.
|
|
3
|
Any tree or shrub which forms part of the approved
landscaping scheme which within a period of five years from
planting fails to become established, becomes seriously damaged or
diseased, dies or for any reason is removed shall be replaced in
the next planting season by a tree or shrub of a species, size and
maturity to be approved by the local planning authority.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development and to
safeguard the visual character of the immediate area in accordance
with Policy CS12 of the Dacorum Core Strategy.
|
|
4
|
The proposed car parking spaces shall have minimum
dimensions of 2.4m by 4.8m and be located on land in the ownership
of the applicant. Such spaces shall be
maintained as a permanent ancillary to the development and shall be
used for no other purpose.
Reason: To
ensure the adequate and satisfactory provision of off-street
vehicle parking facilities in accordance with Policy CS12 of the
Dacorum Core Strategy 2013 and saved Policy 58 of the Dacorum
Borough Local Plan 1991-2011.
|
|
5
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and
Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015
(or any Order amending or re-enacting that Order with or without
modification) no development to the dwelling and ...
view the full minutes text for item 126.
|
|
127. |
4/02124/17/FHA - FIRST FLOOR SIDE EXTENSION AND EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS - 8 HIGHCLERE DRIVE, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 8BT PDF 373 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
B
Curtain introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee due to the contrary views of Nash Mills Parish
Council.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor P
Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 1
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
No development shall take place until samples of the
render proposed to be used on the external walls of the development
shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. The approved
materials shall be used in the implementation of the
development. Other than the proposed
render, the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in
accordance with the materials specified on the approved drawings.
Please do not send materials to the council offices. Materials should be kept on site and arrangements
made with the planning officer for inspection.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development.
|
|
3
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
1868/S & L
1868-01
1868-02
1868-03
1868-04
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
Article 35 Statement
Planning permission has been granted for this proposal.
Discussion with the applicant to seek an acceptable solution was
not necessary in this instance. The Council has therefore acted
pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework
(paragraphs 186 and 187) and in accordance with the Town and
Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
(Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
|
|
128. |
4/01845/17/MFA - DEMOLITION OF FOUR EXISTING DWELLINGS. REDEVELOPMENT TO FORM 40 UNITS OF RETIREMENT LIVING (CATEGORY II SHELTERED HOUSING) APARTMENTS FOR THE ELDERLY WITH ASSOCIATED COMMUNAL FACILITIES , PARKING AND LANDSCAPING - 27-33 HEMPSTEAD ROAD, KINGS LANGLEY PDF 979 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
R
Marber introduced the item to committee and said it had been
referred to committee due to the contrary views of Kings Langley
Parish Council.
Denise Feasey and Richard Roberts spoke in objection to the
application.
Gavin Cooper and Mark Bryan spoke in support of the
application.
Having there been no proposer to grant the application in line
with the officer’s recommendation, it was proposed by
Councillor C Wyatt-Lowe and seconded by Councillor Mills to
overturn the officer’s recommendation and refuse the
application.
Vote
For: 8
Against: 0
Abstained: 2
Resolved:
That planning permission be REFUSED due to the
following reasons:
- The
proposed development, by reason of its layout, site coverage, mass,
scale and bulk is considered to be of an urban scale which would
not respect adjoining properties and would fail to integrate with
the streetscape and cause harm to the character appearance of the
area. As such the proposed development would be contrary to the
National Planning Policy Framework (2012) and Policies CS11 and
CS12 of the Core Strategy (2013).
- S66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (LBA) requires that special regard
shall be had to the desirability of preserving a listed building or
its setting or any features of special architectural or historic
interest that it possesses. S72 (1) of the LBA requires special
attention to be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing
the character or appearance of the conservation area. The proposal
would result in harm to the visible open space which characterises
the setting of the adjacent Grade II Listed Buildings and
conservation area. It is considered that the although the harm
identified would be less than substantial harm to the setting of
the Grade II Listed Buildings and conservation area there would be
a failure to preserve its character and setting. Considerable
importance and weight is attributed to this harm. The public
benefits of the proposal have been identified and considered. These
public benefits, although together they would be significant, do
not provide sufficient justification to override the presumption in
favour of preservation. As such, the less than substantial harm
identified to the setting of Listed Buildings and conservation area
would be irreversible and affect this and future generations
ability to appreciate the significance of these heritage assets.
The development would therefore be contrary to the requirement of
section 66 (1) of the LBA, Paras 132 and 134 of NPPF, Policy CS27
of the Core Strategy and Saved Policy 97 of the Local Plan
(2004).
|
129. |
4/02224/17/FUL - CONVERSION OF BOXMOOR HALL INTO 7 RESIDENTIAL UNITS - BOXMOOR HALL, ST JOHNS ROAD, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP1 1JR PDF 180 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
N
Gibbs introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee as it had been called-in by Councillor
Marshall.
PJ
Grainger-Carr spoke in objection to the application.
In
her role as ward councillor, Councillor Marshall spoke in
objection.
Sally Lardner and David Challinor spoke in support of the
application.
It
was proposed by Councillor Tindall and seconded by Councillor C
Wyatt-Lowe to defer the application to allow for further discussion
with the applicant about reducing the number of flats.
Vote
For: 7
Against: 0
Abstained: 3
Resolved:
That the application be DEFERRED for further
discussions with the applicant.
|
130. |
4/02269/17/MFA - DEMOLITION OF 20 GARAGES AND CONSTRUCTION OF NINE TWO-BED AND TWO ONE-BED DWELLINGS IN TWO BUILDINGS WITH LANDSCAPING, BIN STORE AND CYCLE STORE AND 16 PARKING SPACES - LAND NORTH EAST OF 25 GOLDCROFT, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD PDF 1 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
J Gardner introduced the item and said it had been
referred to the committee as the land is
currently owned by Dacorum Borough Council.
Patrick O’Sullivan spoke in support of the
application.
It was proposed by Councillor C Wyatt-Lowe and
seconded by Councillor Birnie to grant the application in line with
the officer’s recommendation.
Vote
For: 10
Against: 0 Abstained:
0
Resolved:
That
planning permission be DELEGATED with a
view to grant subject to completion of a S.106 agreement and the
following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
ALP004
APL006
APL007
APL008
ALP009
ALP010
ALP011
ALP012
ALP013
APL014
APL015
ALP017
ALP018
Development Site Impact Assessment & Method
Statement (Bartlett Consulting) Date: Thursday 12th October
2017
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
|
3
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
constructed in accordance with the materials specified on the
approved drawings or such other materials as may be agreed in
writing by the local planning authority.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development.
|
|
4
|
The development permitted by this planning permission
shall be carried out in accordance with the approved The Drainage
and SuDS Strategy carried out by Price & Myers reference 26156
Rev 2 dated August 2017 and supporting information submitted and
the following mitigation measures detailed within the
FRA:
·
Implement appropriate drainage
strategy based on attenuation and discharge into Thames Surface
water sewer.
·
Limiting the surface water run-off to
a maximum of 3l/s generated by the 1 in 100 year + climate change
critical storm so that it will not exceed the run-off from the
undeveloped site and not increase the risk of flooding
off-site.
·
Implement drainage strategy utilising
permeable paving and attenuation tank.
Reason: To
reduce the risk of flooding to the proposed development and future
occupants.
|
|
5
|
No development shall take place until the final
design of the drainage scheme is completed and sent to the LPA for
approval. The scheme shall also include:
·
Detailed engineered drawings of the
proposed SuDS features including their location, size, volume,
depth and any inlet and outlet features including any connecting
pipe runs and all corresponding calculation.
·
Final design should incorporate silt
traps and appropriate pollution prevention methods to ensure
surface water run-off from the proposed car parking and roads can
be treated in a sustainable manner and reduce the requirement for
maintenance of underground features.
·
Detailed surface water calculations
for all rainfall events up to and including the 1 in 100 year +
climate change event supported by a clearly labelled drainage
layout plan showing pipe networks. This plan should show any pipe
'node numbers' that have ...
view the full minutes text for item 130.
|
|
131. |
4/02553/17/MFA - CHANGE OF USE FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND TO CEMETERY, TO INCLUDE VISITOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, ROAD AND PATHWAYS, CAR PARKING AND LANDSCAPING - LAND SOUTH WEST, BEDMOND ROAD, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 8LN PDF 1 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
B
Curtain introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee as the land is owned by Dacorum Borough
Council.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor
Maddern to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 1
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
constructed in accordance with the materials specified on the
approved drawings.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in accordance
with Policy Cs12 of the Core Strategy.
|
|
3
|
All
burials in the cemetery shall be:
a
minimum of 50 m from a potable groundwater supply
source;
a
minimum of 30 m from a water course or spring;
a
minimum of 10 m distance from field drains; and
not
in standing water and the base of the grave must be above the local
water table.
Reasons To protect the quality of
groundwater in the local area. Groundwater is particularly
sensitive in this location because the proposed development site is
within Source Protection Zone 3, meaning it is used for drinking
water supplies, and is located upon a Principal Aquifer. In
addition, the Thames River Basin Management Plan requires the
restoration and enhancement of water bodies to prevent
deterioration and promote recovery; without this condition, the
proposal could cause deterioration of a drinking water protected
area located within the Mid-Chilterns Chalk groundwater
body.
This is in line with your Local Plan policy CS31 to avoid damage
to Groundwater Source Protection Zones, and also paragraph 109 of
the National Planning Policy Framework to prevent unacceptable
risks to groundwater resources.
Advice on
Condition 1
The
developer should conduct a protected rights survey to ensure that
no licensed or unlicensed groundwater abstraction (to include
abstractions from springs, wells and boreholes) in the adjacent
areas will be derogated in either quality or quantity as a result
of this development. The Environment Agency does not keep records
of where private water supplies are located. These details are held
by local authorities and the Drinking Water
Inspectorate.
|
|
4
|
If, during
development, contamination not previously identified is found to be
present at the site then no further development (unless otherwise
agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority) shall be
carried out until a remediation strategy detailing how this
contamination will be dealt with has been submitted to and approved
in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The remediation
strategy shall be implemented as approved.
Reasons; To
protect the quality of groundwater in the local area as no
investigation can completely characterise a site. Groundwater is
particularly sensitive in this location because the proposed
development ...
view the full minutes text for item 131.
|
|
132. |
4/02649/17/FUL - CONSTRUCTION OF SIX 2-BED FLATS (AMENDED SCHEME) - GARAGE SITE ON CORNER OF TEESDALE AND WESTERDALE, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP2 PDF 622 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
B
Curtain introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee as Dacorum Borough Council owns the land.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor P
Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 10
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
Notwithstanding the details submitted, prior to the
construction (above ground works) of the development hereby
approved, details of the materials to be used in the construction
of the external surfaces shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance
with the approved details. Please do
not send materials to the council offices. Materials should be kept on site and arrangements
made with the planning officer for inspection.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development.
|
|
3
|
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied until the arrangements for vehicle parking, access and
circulation, shown on Drawing No. WNS-AHR-S1-00-DR-A-05-002 shall
have been provided, and they shall not be used thereafter otherwise
than for the purposes approved.
Reason: To
ensure the adequate and satisfactory provision of off-street
vehicle parking facilities.
|
|
4
|
Prior to
the commencement of the development hereby permitted a Phase I
Report to assess the actual or potential contamination at the site
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning
authority. If actual or potential contamination and/or ground gas
risks are identified further investigation shall be carried out and
a Phase II report shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the local planning authority prior to the commencement of the
development. If the Phase II report establishes that remediation or
protection measures are necessary a Remediation Statement shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority.
For the
purposes of this condition:
A Phase I
Report consists of a desk study, site walkover, conceptual model
and a preliminary risk assessment. The desk study comprises a
search of
available information and historical maps which can be used to
identify the likelihood of contamination. A simple walkover survey
of the site is conducted to identify pollution linkages not obvious
from desk studies. Using the information gathered, a
'conceptual model' of the site is constructed and a preliminary risk assessment is carried
out.
A Phase II
Report consists of an intrusive site investigation and risk
assessment. The report should make recommendations for further
investigation and assessment where required.
A
Remediation Statement details actions to be carried out and
timescales so that contamination no longer presents a risk to site
users, property, the environment or ecological ...
view the full minutes text for item 132.
|
|
133. |
4/02647/17/FUL - CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR 2-BED AND TWO 1-BED FLATS (AMENDED SCHEMES) - GARAGES ADJ STORNOWAY, NORTHEND, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 PDF 695 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
B
Curtain introduced the item and said it had been referred to
committee as Dacorum Borough Council owns the land.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor Mills
to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 10
Against: 0 Abstained:
0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
|
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2
|
No development shall take place until details of the
materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces
of the development hereby permitted have been submitted and
approved in writing by the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance
with the approved details. Please do
not send materials to the council offices. Materials should be kept on site and arrangements
made with the planning officer for inspection.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development.
|
|
3
|
No development shall take place until an
Arboricultural methodology statement has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the local planning authority. The
Arboricultural methodology statement shall set out what steps are
to be taken to protect the trees on the site for the duration of
construction. The development shall be carried out fully in
accordance with the approved details.
Reason: To
safeguard those landscape features of significant upon the
application site in accordance with Policy CS12 and saved Policy 99
of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991-2011.
|
|
4
|
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied until the arrangements for vehicle parking, circulation,
loading and unloading shown on Drawing No.
WNS-AHR-S0-00-DR-A-05-0002 Revision B shall have been provided, and
they shall not be used thereafter otherwise than for the purposes
approved.
Reason: To ensure the adequate and
satisfactory provision of off-street vehicle parking
facilities.
|
|
5
|
Prior to the commencement of the development hereby permitted a
Phase IReport to assess the
actual or potential contamination at the site shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the local planning authority. If actual
or potential contamination and/or ground gas risks are identified
further investigation shall be carried out and a Phase II report
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning
authority prior to the commencement of the development. If the
Phase II report establishes that remediation or protection measures
are necessary a Remediation Statement shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
For the purposes of this condition:
A Phase I Report consists of a desk study, site
walkover, conceptual model and a preliminary risk assessment. The
desk study comprises a search of
available information and historical maps which can be used to
identify the likelihood of contamination. A simple walkover
...
view the full minutes text for item 133.
|
|
134. |
Appeals update PDF 41 KB
Minutes:
The following appeals were
noted:
1.
Lodged
|