Venue: Council Chamber, The Forum. View directions
Contact: Katie Mogan Member Support
No. | Item | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting (these are circulated separately) Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 08 September 2016 were confirmed by the Members present and were then signed by the Chairman.
An addendum to the agenda was circulated before the meeting. A copy of the addendum can be found on the DBC website on the following link:
https://democracy.dacorum.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=159&MId=504
|
|||||||||||||
Apologies for absence To receive any apologies for absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Maddern, Matthews and Tindall.
Councillor P Hearn substituted on behalf of Councillor Maddern.
Councillor Bateman substituted on behalf of Councillor Matthews |
|||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest
A member with a disclosable pecuniary interest or a personal interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered -
(i) must disclose the interest at the start of the meeting or when the interest
becomes
apparent and, if the interest is a disclosable pecuniary interest, or a personal (ii) may not participate in any discussion or vote on the matter (and must withdraw to the public seating area) unless they have been granted a dispensation. A member who discloses at a meeting a disclosable pecuniary interest which is not registered in the Members’ Register of Interests, or is not the subject of a pending notification, must notify the Monitoring Officer of the interest within 28 days of the disclosure.
Disclosable pecuniary interests, personal and prejudicial interests are defined in Part 2 of the Code of Conduct For Members
[If a member is in any doubt as to whether they have an interest which should be declared they should seek the advice of the Monitoring Officer before the start of the meeting]
It is requested that Members complete the pink interest sheet which will be made available at the meeting and then hand this to the Committee Clerk at the meeting Minutes: Councillor D Collins asked Members to remember to declare any Disclosable Pecuniary or other Interests at the beginning of the relevant planning application.
|
|||||||||||||
Public Participation An opportunity for members of the public to make statements or ask questions in accordance with the rules as to public participation.
You need to inform the council in advance if you wish to speak by contacting Member Support on Tel: 01442 228221 or by email: Member.support@dacorum.gov.uk
There are limits on how much of each meeting can be taken up with people having their say and how long each person can speak for. The permitted times are specified in the table above and are allocated for each of the following on a 'first come, first served basis':
· Town/Parish Council and Neighbourhood Associations; · Objectors to an application; · Supporters of the application.
Every person must, when invited to do so, address their statement or question to the Chairman of the Committee.
Every person must after making a statement or asking a question take their seat to listen to the reply or if they wish join the public for the rest of the meeting or leave the meeting. The questioner may not ask the same or a similar question within a six month period except for the following circumstances:
(a) deferred planning applications which have foregone a significant or material change since originally being considered
(b) resubmitted planning applications which have foregone a significant or material change
(c) any issues which are resubmitted to Committee in view of further facts or information to be considered.
At a meeting of the Development Control Committee, a person, or their representative, may speak on a particular planning application, provided that it is on the agenda to be considered at the meeting.
Minutes: Councillor D Collins reminded the members and the public about the rules regarding public participation. |
|||||||||||||
4/00122/16/MFA - CAR PARK, LOWER KINGS ROAD, BERKHAMSTED, HP4 2AJ PDF 2 MB Additional documents:
Minutes: Councillor D Collins and Councillor Ritchie made a statement before the start of the item – “I do not have an interest to declare but I would like to make it clear that I am the ward councillor for this application. I am also a member of Berkhamsted Town Council that supports the principle of a Multi-Storey Car Park in Berkhamsted. I have previously expressed my support to the principle of a Multi-Storey Car Park, however, I retain an open mind to the planning merits of this development and will make my decision based upon the evidence and debate that I hear tonight” Councillor Bateman also declared that he was a ward councillor in Berkhamsted. J Doe, Assistant Director for Planning, Development and Regeneration introduced the item and made the following statement: There is pressure for public parking in Berkhamsted and limited opportunities as to where to site a new facility. Key to this is the Savell Bird Axon report of 2012 which provided background for the Council’s decision to pursue plans to develop the proposal that you now have before you tonight. As the development control committee, and acting for the Council as Local Planning Authority, the role of the Committee is to determine the proposals as they stand. There is a high level of objection to the scheme and views of residents and others are summarised in the report and the addendum report. Most of the objections relate to material planning considerations and Officers consider that they are addressed in the report, and indeed officers are on hand tonight to provide further advice and clarity if required. Issues such as the use of Council funding to build the car park, its business case, whether there should have been further consultation on options, or further design reviews are not relevant to the deliberations of the Committee: as planning authority, you have to determine the proposals that are before you and the judgement is whether they are acceptable in planning terms. The application is recommended for approval as your Officers consider that the planning balance weighs in favour of the scheme as submitted (subject to conditions). The car park proposal is situated centrally to Berkhamsted Town Centre and Officers are satisfied that the location is appropriate and beneficial to its intended users. Specifically, the location supports convenient use of the facilities in the High Street both in terms of the daytime and indeed night time economies of Berkhamsted Town centre. Berkhamsted is a highly successful town centre in an age when many are suffering with under-occupancy and diversion of trade to out of centre locations and also online shopping. The evidence before you this evening shows that there is parking strain in Berkhamsted Town Centre, and if the town is to continue to thrive into the future it is important that those using it are able to park conveniently. The Council’s own policy set out in the 2013 Core Strategy clearly sets out a vision for Berkhamsted as a sustainable ... view the full minutes text for item 72. |
|||||||||||||
4/01420/16/FUL - 85 BUCKWOOD ROAD, MARKYATE, ST ALBANS, AL3 8JE PDF 119 KB Additional documents: Minutes: E Palmer introduced the report and said it had been brought to the committee due to the contrary views of Markyate Parish Council. Andrew Whiteley spoke in support of this application. Parish Councillor Pilkinton spoke in objection to the application. Julie Brasier spoke in objection to the application. It was proposed by Councillor Clark and seconded by Councillor Fisher that the application be granted in line with the officer’s recommendation. Vote For: 6 Against: 1 Abstained: 6 Resolved: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
|
|||||||||||||
4/01933/16/FUL - MERRICKS, 328 HIGH STREET, BERKHAMSTED, HP4 1HT PDF 253 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Ritchie declared a personal interest in this item as he knew the applicant on a personal basis. He reserved his right to speak but abstained from the vote. N Gibbs introduced the report and said it been brought to committee due to a similar scheme previously being refused by the Development Control Committee. Penny Ingram spoke in support of the application. Toby Cotton spoke in objection to the application. It was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor Whitman to grant the application in line with the officer’s recommendation with “garage” omitted from condition 4. Vote For: 11 Against: 0 Abstained: 2 Resolved: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
|
|||||||||||||
4/01198/16/FHA - 17 CHAPEL STREET, BERKHAMSTED, HP4 2EA PDF 238 KB Additional documents: Minutes: M Heron introduced the report and said it had been brought to committee due to the contrary views of Berkhamsted Town Council. M Heron said if members were mindful to grant the application, a material specification condition would be added. Sean Stanley and Nick Williams spoke in support of the application. It was proposed by Councillor Whitman and seconded by Councillor P Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s recommendation. Vote For: 13 Against: 0 Abstained: 0 Resolved: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
|
|||||||||||||
4/01664/16/FUL - 31, 31A & 31B HIGH STREET, KINGS LANGLEY, WD4 8AB PDF 409 KB Additional documents: Minutes: M Stickley introduced the report and said it had been brought to committee due to objections from Councillor Alan Anderson and Kings Langley Parish Council. Councillor Anderson in his role as Ward Councillor spoke in objection to this application It was proposed by Councillor Ritchie and seconded by Councillor Fisher to grant the application in line with the officer’s recommendation. Vote For: 5 Against: 7 Abstained: 1 Having there been no majority to grant this application in line with the officer’s recommendation, it was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor Whitman that the officer’s decision be overturned and the application be refused. Vote For: 8 Against: 4 Abstained: 1 Resolved: That planning permission be REFUSED due to the following reasons: No on-site parking is proposed for the two new residential units. This would result in an increased demand for on-street parking both in terms of consistency and frequency. Kings Langley High Street is an area that suffers from an inadequate supply of on-street parking spaces. Increasing the number of vehicles parking on-street would have a negative impact on the surrounding road network and may lead to issues regarding congestion and highway safety, contrary to Core Strategy Policies CS8 and CS12 and saved policies 57, policy 58 and Appendix 5 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan (1999-2011)
|
|||||||||||||
4/01097/16/FUL - ISBISTER CENTRE, CHAULDEN HOUSE GARDENS, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP1 2BW PDF 308 KB Additional documents: Minutes: R Marber introduced the report and said it had been brought to committee because Dacorum Borough Council own the land. It was proposed by Councillor Whitman and seconded by Councillor Birnie to grant the application in line with the officer’s recommendation. Vote For: 13 Against: 0 Abstained: 0 Resolved: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
|
|||||||||||||
4/01864/16/FUL - 41 MARLOWES, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP1 1LD PDF 437 KB Additional documents: Minutes: M Heron introduced the item and said it had been brought to committee as the land was owned by Dacorum Borough Council. It was proposed by Councillor C Wyatt-Lowe and seconded by Councillor Whitman to grant the application in line with the officer’s recommendation. Vote For: 13 Against: 0 Abstained: 0 Resolved: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
|
|||||||||||||
Minutes: That the following appeals be noted:
|