Minutes:
A Harman introduced the item to members and said it had been referred to committee due to the contrary views of Berkhamsted Town Council.
Timothy Jenkinson and Ross Massingale spoke in objection to the application.
In his role as town councillor, Councillor Armytage spoke in objection to the application.
In his role as ward councillor, Councillor D Collins spoke in objection to the application.
Peter Knightly spoke in support of the application.
It was proposed by Councillor Mills and seconded by Councillor P Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s recommendation.
Vote
For: 5 Against: 4 Abstained: 1
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
1 |
The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: To comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. |
2 |
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans/documents: 17 502 PL 12B Design and Accessibility and Sustainability Statement Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. |
3 |
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any Order amending or re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no development falling within the following classes of the Order shall be carried out without the prior written approval of the local planning authority:
Reason: To enable the local planning authority to retain control over the development in the interests of safeguarding the residential and visual amenity of the locality in accordance with Adopted Core Strategy CS12. |
4 |
Prior to the commencement of the development hereby permitted a Phase I Report to assess the actual or potential contamination at the site shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. If actual or potential contamination and/or ground gas risks are identified further investigation shall be carried out and a Phase II report shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority prior to the commencement of the development. If the Phase II report establishes that remediation or protection measures are necessary a Remediation Statement shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. For the purposes of this condition: A Phase I Report consists of a desk study, site walkover, conceptual model and a preliminary risk assessment. The desk study comprises a search of available information and historical maps which can be used to identify the likelihood of contamination. A simple walkover survey of the site is conducted to identify pollution linkages not obvious from desk studies. Using the information gathered, a ‘conceptual model’ of the site is constructed and a preliminary risk assessment is carried out. A Phase II Report consists of an intrusive site investigation and risk assessment. The report should make recommendations for further investigation and assessment where required. A Remediation Statement details actions to be carried out and timescales so that contamination no longer presents a risk to site users, property, the environment or ecological systems. Reason: To ensure that the issue of contamination is adequately addressed and to ensure a satisfactory development in accordance with Adopted Core Strategy CS32 |
5 |
All remediation or protection measures identified in the Remediation Statement referred to in Condition (4) shall be fully implemented within the timescales and by the deadlines as set out in the Remediation Statement and a Site Completion Report shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority prior to the first occupation of any part of the development hereby permitted. For the purposes of this condition a Site Completion Report shall record all the investigation and remedial or protection actions carried out. It shall detail all conclusions and actions taken at each stage of the works including validation work. It shall contain quality assurance and validation results providing evidence that the site has been remediated to a standard suitable for the approved use. Reason: To ensure that the issue of contamination is adequately addressed and to ensure a satisfactory development in accordance with Adopted Core Strategy CS32. Informative: Paragraph 121 of the NPPF states that all site investigation information must be prepared by a competent person. This is defined in the framework as ‘A person with a recognised relevant qualification, sufficient experience in dealing with the type(s) of pollution or land instability, and membership of a relevant professional organisation.’ Contaminated Land Planning Guidance can be obtained from Regulatory Services or via the Council’s website www.dacorum.gov.uk Article 35 Statement Planning permission has been granted for this proposal. The Council acted pro-actively through positive engagement with the applicant during the determination process which led to improvements to the scheme. The Council has therefore acted pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework (paragraphs 186 and 187) and in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) (Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
|
Supporting documents: