Agenda item

Proposals for a Development Company

Decision:

  1. The procurement of specialist technical advice to progress work on the creation of a Development Company be approved;
  2. The primary objectives of the Development Company, as detailed in paragraph 7 of the Cabinet report be approved and,
  3. The development sites identified in paragraph 12 to form the initial pipeline for the Development Company be approved,

Resolved to Recommend:

 

4.     A draw down of £100k from the Invest to Save reserve, in order to fund the procurement of advice associated with the creation of a Development Company and further associated costs.

 

Minutes:

Decision

  1. The procurement of specialist technical advice to progress work on the creation of a Development Company be approved;
  2. The primary objectives of the Development Company, as detailed in paragraph 7 of the Cabinet report be approved and,
  3. The development sites identified in paragraph 12 to form the initial pipeline for the Development Company be approved,

Resolved to Recommend:

 

4.     A draw down of £100k from the Invest to Save reserve, in order to fund the procurement of advice associated with the creation of a Development Company and further associated costs.

 

Reason for Decision

 

To gain Cabinet approval for the overarching principles of a Council-owned Development Company, ahead of procuring specialist, technical advice.

 

Implications

 

Financial

 

The financial implications are included within the body of the report.

 

 

Value for Money

 

The procurement exercise will be governed by the Council’s Procurement Standing Orders, deigned to ensure fair competition and maximise value for money.

 

Risk Implications

 

There are limited risks associated with the recommended procurement at this stage of the project. The risks inherent with the actual creation of a company will be reported back to Cabinet to consider later in the year, before the next steps are taken.

Health & Safety Implications

None.

Corporate Objectives

This project aligns with all of the Council’s corporate objectives, as approved by Council in February 2016.

 

Monitoring Officer/S.151 Officer Comments

 

Monitoring Officer:  

 

The Council has the power to establish a Development Company pursuant to provisions contained in the Local Government Act 1972, Local Government Act 2003 and the Localism Act 2011.

 

As highlighted in the report, detailed legal advice will be obtained in relation to the governance arrangements which will operate between the Council and the Development Company, the applicability of ‘State Aid’ rules (EU rules in place to prevent members states distorting cross boundary competition), and the Council’s requirement to achieve ‘best consideration’ for any disposal/transfer of land to the Development Company.

 

Comprehensive advice on all of the above issues will be provided in future reports to Cabinet in due course.

 

S.151 Officer

This is a Section 151 Officer report.

Advice

 

The Portfolio Holder for Finance & Resources explained that the purpose of the report was to seek approval for a development company to provide and secure investment income for the future. The report had suggested a budget of £100k and this was to ensure no risks were taken with potentially having a short fall and having to return to Cabinet with a further budget request.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Residents & Corporate Services asked what the differences were between what the council currently did and how this would change.

The Corporate Director of Finance & Operations explained that currently this was affecting the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), however in the future the hope would be to maximise revenue income to support the provision of General Fund services. Furthermore, currently developments were subject to right to buy and therefore not guaranteed long term income. The development company proposal would help ensure long term viable income. He highlighted the importance of needing clear objectives for the development company.

 

The Corporate Director for Housing and Regeneration said they must help to protect the council’s position. He added that there wouldn’t be many differences to the process.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Housing sought clarification that this duty would form part of the General Fund as opposed to the HRA.

The Corporate Director for Housing and Regeneration confirmed that they could charge rents to the General Fund in order to help support the council’s objectives.

The Chief Executive added that there were a number of council’s already doing this.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Residents & Corporate Services asked how the figure of £100k being requested was calculated.

The Corporate Director of Finance & Operations explained that many other council’s budgets had been in the region of £60-70k and he did not want to have to return to Cabinet requesting further funds due to there being a shortfall in the budget. He assured members of the Cabinet that they would be carrying out the required tendering process.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Housing recommended that recommendation (4) be broadened to read ‘A draw down of £100k from the Invest to Save reserve, in order to fund the procurement of advice associated with the creation of a Development Company and further associated costs.’

 

The Portfolio Holder for Environmental, Sustainability & Regulatory Services asked if during the tendering process they would be looking for ideas for the use of a development company and would they be able to embrace many areas or would they be limited to just Housing.

 

The Corporate Director of Finance & Operations explained that the report listed the key objectives. They didn’t want to create a complex process as it needed to get started.

The Corporate Director for Housing and Regeneration felt that it would be likely that a development company would be able to cover broader areas.

 

The Chief Executive said that this was explained in paragraph 8 of the report and by including some key objectives, meant that there would be a more focussed discussion.

The Corporate Director of Finance & Operations added that they did not want to prohibit the scope of the company and therefore a further report would be presented to Cabinet to look into these aspects.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Environmental, Sustainability & Regulatory Services asked which other council’s did things this way.

The Chief Executive replied that virtually all the Eastern Region councils were looking to do it if they weren’t already doing so.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Residents & Corporate Services asked if bidders through the tendering process will be asked to provide examples as a way of evidencing their experiences.

The Corporate Director for Housing and Regeneration confirmed this would be the case and said that many of those making a bid will have had experience with other council’s.

 

Voting

 

None.

 

Supporting documents: