Agenda item

20/02901/LBC - Binghams Park, Potten End Hill, Water End, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP1 3BN

Minutes:

The report was introduced by the case officer Jane Miller

 

It was proposed by councillor Maddern and seconded by Councillor Beauchamp that the application be Granted

 

Vote:

 

For:       10       against:           0          Abstained:       1

 

Resolved:  GRANTED

 

1.         The works hereby permitted shall begin before the expiration of three years from the date of this consent.

           

            Reason:  To comply with Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 (4) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

 

 2.        The works hereby permitted shall be constructed in accordance with the materials specified on the application form and approved plans.

           

            Reason: To ensure that the character or appearance of the designated heritage asset is preserved or enhanced in accordance with Policy CS27 of the Dacorum Borough Core Strategy (2013) and Section 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019).

 

 3.        The works hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans/documents:

           

            site location plan received 26.11.2020

            block plan received 26.11.2020

            20/1054/1 existing ground floor

            20/1054/2 existing first floor

            20/1054/9 existing roof plan

            20/1054/3 existing east and west elevation

            20/1054/4 existing north and south elevation

            20/1054/5 proposed ground floor plan received 01.12.2020

            20/1054/6 proposed first floor plan received 01.12.2020

            20/1054/7 proposed east and west elevations received 01.12.2020

            20/1054/8 prpposed north and south elevation received 01.12.2020

           

            Reason:  For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

 

 

 

Informatives:

 

 

 1.        Listed building consent has been granted for this proposal. The Council acted pro-actively through early engagement with the applicant at the pre-application stage which lead to improvements to the scheme. The Council has therefore acted pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework (paragraph 38) and in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) (Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.

 

APPENDIX A: CONSULTEE RESPONSES

 

Consultee

Comments

Historic England

Thank you for your letter of 02 October 2020 regarding the above application for listed building consent. On the basis of the information available to date, in our view you do not need to notify or consult us on this application under the relevant statutory provisions, details of which are enclosed. 

           

If you consider that this application does fall within one of the relevant categories, or you have other reasons for seeking our advice, please contact us to discuss your request.   

           

 

Parish/Town Council

No objection

Conservation & Design (DBC)

03.12.2020     

'that confirming our meeting, we agreed that, given the fact it could not be moved back from the front elevation satisfactorily, the rebuilding of the bootroom was acceptable, with the configuration of the altered roof as shown with twin gables.   With the proposed rooflight to the main range now omitted from the application, this removes one of the original objections.  On another matter, it was noted that the newly rebuilt gables to the east elevation had not been finished as shown on the approved drawings, and that this would form a separate application to regularise the changes'.

           

20.10.2020     

This is a variation on the existing permission.          

Could we ask for more of an explanation as to why the boot room extension requires a complex double gabled roof - would a simple hipped roof not suffice?         

           

Also I note there's a rooflight shown on the main roof - was this part of the allowed permission - if it is part of this application, I would be concerned that it may be cutting through the original framed rafters.            

 

 

APPENDIX B: NEIGHBOUR RESPONSES

 

Number of Neighbour Comments

 

Neighbour

Consultations

Contributors

Neutral

Objections

Support

0

0

0

0

0

 

Neighbour Responses

 

Address

 

Comments

 

 

Supporting documents: