Minutes:
The report was introduced by the case officer Jane Miller
It was clarified that this is before the committee as Mrs Symington is an elected member of Council, she is not a current member of the Development Management Committee
It was proposed by Councillor Wyatt-Lowe and seconded by Councillor Maddern that the application be Granted
Vote:
For: 10 against: 0 Abstained: 1
Resolved: GRANTED
1. The development hereby permitted shall begin before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: To comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 (1) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
2. The development hereby permitted shall be constructed in accordance with the materials specified on the application form and approved plans.
Reason: To make sure that the appearance of the building is suitable and that it contributes to the character of the area in accordance with Policies CS11 and CS12 of the Dacorum Borough Core Strategy (2013).
3. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans/documents:
site location plan received 26.11.2020
block plan received 26.11.2020
20/1054/1 existing ground floor
20/1054/2 existing first floor
20/1054/9 existing roof plan
20/1054/3 existing east and west elevation
20/1054/4 existing north and south elevation
20/1054/5 proposed ground floor plan received 01.12.2020
20/1054/6 proposed first floor plan received 01.12.2020
20/1054/7 proposed east and west elevations received 01.12.2020
20/1054/8 prpposed north and south elevation received 01.12.2020
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.
Informatives:
1. Planning permission has been granted for this proposal. The Council acted pro-actively through positive engagement with the applicant during the determination process which led to improvements to the scheme. The Council has therefore acted pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework (paragraph 38) and in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) (Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
APPENDIX A: CONSULTEE RESPONSES
Consultee |
Comments |
Environmental And Community Protection (DBC) |
Having reviewed the documentation submitted with the above planning application and having considered the information held the by ECP team I have the following advice and recommendations in relation to land contamination. The development, if permitted, will not result in a change of land use and there is no former land use on or immediately adjacent to the application site that would be expected to result in ground contamination. However, the application includes the relocation of an oil tank. As such, it is considered that the following contaminated land informative shall be sufficient, if planning permission is to be granted. This highlights the potential for unexpected contamination arising from the oil tank and associated pipework to be encountered and if present for it to be dealt with in an appropriate way.
Informative Should any ground contamination be encountered during the relocation of the oil tank and associated pipework, works shall be temporarily suspended, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and a Contamination Remediation Scheme shall be submitted to (as soon as practically possible) and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The Contamination Remediation Scheme shall detail all measures required to render this contamination harmless and all approved measures shall subsequently be fully implemented prior to the first occupation of the development hereby approved.
Should it be needed, for guidance on the appropriate installation of new domestic oil storage please refer to the following webpage https://www.gov.uk/oil-storage-regulations-and-safety/home
21.10.2020 No comment for noise and Air pollution.
|
The Chiltern Society |
no response received |
Chilterns Conservation Board |
no response received |
Parish/Town Council |
No objection |
Conservation & Design (DBC) |
Confirming our meeting, we agreed that, given the fact it could not be moved back from the front elevation satisfactorily, the rebuilding of the bootroom was acceptable, with the configuration of the altered roof as shown with twin gables. With the proposed rooflight to the main range now omitted from the application, this removes one of the original objections. On another matter, it was noted that the newly rebuilt gables to the east elevation had not been finished as shown on the approved drawings, and that this would form a separate application to regularise the changes.
|
APPENDIX B: NEIGHBOUR RESPONSES
Number of Neighbour Comments
Neighbour Consultations |
Contributors |
Neutral |
Objections |
Support |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Neighbour Responses
Address
|
Comments |
Supporting documents: