Decision:
1. RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND:
· The adoption of the new Local Development
Scheme as set out in the report to Cabinet.
2. That the headline results from the forthcoming Authority Monitoring Report 2014/15 with regard to housing, employment and retailing be noted;
3. That progress on the Local Planning Framework be noted
Minutes:
Decision
1. RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND COUNCIL:
· The adoption of the new Local Development
Scheme as set out in the report to Cabinet.
2. That the headline results from the forthcoming Authority Monitoring Report 2014/15 with regard to housing, employment and retailing be noted;
3. That progress on the Local Planning Framework be noted
Reason for Decision
To consider:
· the Authority Monitoring Report for 2014/15;
· progress on the Local Planning Framework; and
· recommend publication of a revised Local Development Scheme to Council.
Implications
Financial
Funding is provided from the LDF reserve. A budget has been agreed for 2015/16. The 2016/17 budget is currently being reviewed as part of the annual budget cycle.
Value for Money
Every effort has been made to secure external funding – most recently through the New Homes Bonus, to reduce the impact on the Council’s budget. Where possible, evidence base work is undertaken jointly with other authorities to ensure cost is optimised (through economies of scale). Collaborative working with landowner consultants will continue to help extend the resources available to the Council and avoid the duplication of site specific technical information.
Risk Implications
A risk assessment has been carried out as part of the PID / CORVU monitoring process.The Local Development Scheme also contains its own risk assessment. The key concern is that the (new) development plan must be sound, and delivers what is needed expeditiously. Risk is reduced by ensuring processes and the evidence base is robust. Sufficient financial resources are essential to achieve that: this includes maintaining a team of appropriately skilled and qualified staff. Certain elements of the plan-making process have explicit statutory requirements such as consultation, publication, examination and presentation of the adopted Development Plan Document. The Authority Monitoring Report reviews the risks inherent in preparing the Local Planning Framework. Monitoring of development is a source of information which, properly used, can assist risk reduction – i.e. it checks whether progress and control of development has been successful and can indicate where change (in policy or process) may be beneficial.
Community Impact Assessment
An Equality Impact Assessment has been carried out for the Core Strategy. This is currently being converted and updated into a broader Community Impact Assessment. An independent Sustainability Appraisal Report which accompanies the Core Strategy also considers equalities issues separately. It concludes that the Core Strategy avoids any discrimination on the basis of disability, gender or ethnic minority.
Health And Safety Implications
None
Corporate Objectives
The Authority Monitoring Report looks at the effectiveness of current planning policies – for example the achievement of the overall housing target and protection of green space/wildlife sites – and progress towards planning policy review (i.e. targets set out in the Local Development Scheme). It therefore provides a good summary of how the Council’s planning policies are supporting delivery of corporate objectives – especially those relating to affordable housing; safe and clean environment and regeneration.
As the policies within the Core Strategy and other planning documents are aimed at enabling growth, it also provides an indication of how the ‘Dacorum Delivers’ objective is being supported.
Advice
The Strategic Planning & Regeneration Officer said that the report was to seek member’s views and to recommend to Council the adoption of the new Local Development Scheme as set out in the report to Cabinet. He added that a letter had been received earlier in the day from Savills who represented GUI. They had raised concerns around the timetable for the term ending 2017/18, which they had interpreted as being the end of December 2017. However the council had intended that this would actually end March 2018. The timetable fully reflected this position.
The Portfolio Holder for Environmental, Sustainability & Regulatory Services felt that it was appropriate to clarify the wording.
The Strategic Planning & Regeneration Team Leader said they could cross reference in the Local Development Scheme and explain the timetable would go to the end of the financial year 2017/18.
Consultation
Consultation took place with:
Corporate Management Team.
Voting
None.
Supporting documents: