Items
No. |
Item |
229. |
Minutes
To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting
(these are circulated separately)
Minutes:
|
230. |
Apologies for absence
To receive any apologies for absence
Minutes:
Apologies of absence were received from Councillors Fisher,
Ritchie, Tindall and C Wyatt-Lowe.
|
231. |
Declarations of Interest
To receive any declarations of
interest
A member
with a disclosable pecuniary interest or a personal interest in a
matter who attends
a
meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered
-
(i)
must disclose the interest at the start of the
meeting or when the interest
becomes apparent and, if the interest is a
disclosable pecuniary interest, or a personal
interest which is also prejudicial
(ii)
may not participate in any discussion or vote on the
matter (and must withdraw
to the
public seating area) unless they have been granted a
dispensation.
A
member who discloses at a meeting a disclosable pecuniary interest
which is not registered in the Members’ Register of
Interests, or is not the subject of a pending notification, must
notify the Monitoring Officer of the interest within 28 days of the
disclosure.
Disclosable pecuniary interests, personal and prejudicial
interests are defined in Part 2 of the Code of Conduct For
Members
[If a
member is in any doubt as to whether they have an interest which
should be declared they
should
seek the advice of the Monitoring Officer before the start of the
meeting]
It is requested that Members
declare their interest at the beginning of the relevant agenda item
and it will be noted by the Committee Clerk for inclusion in the
minutes.
Minutes:
Councillor Guest asked Members
to remember to declare any Disclosable Pecuniary or other Interests
at the beginning of the relevant planning application
|
232. |
Public Participation
An
opportunity for members of the public to make statements or ask
questions in accordance with the rules as to public
participation.
Time per speaker
|
Total Time
Available
|
How to let
us know
|
When we
need to know by
|
3
minutes
|
Where more than 1 person wishes to speak on a planning
application, the shared time is increased from 3 minutes to 5
minutes.
|
In
writing or by phone
|
Noon the day of the meeting
|
You
need to inform the council in advance if you wish to speak by
contacting Member Support on Tel: 01442 228221 or by email:
Member.support@dacorum.gov.uk
Please note the Development Management Committee will finish at
10.30pm and any unheard applications will be deferred to the next
meeting.
There are limits on how much of each meeting can be taken up
with people having their say and how long each person can speak
for. The permitted times are specified
in the table above and are allocated for each of the following on a
'first come, first served basis':
·
Town/Parish Council and Neighbourhood
Associations;
·
Objectors to an application;
·
Supporters of the application.
Every person must, when invited to do so, address their
statement or question to the Chairman of the Committee.
Every person
must after making a statement or asking a question take their seat
to listen to the reply or if they wish join the public for the rest
of the meeting or leave the meeting.
The questioner may not
ask the same or a similar question within a six month period except
for the following circumstances:
(a)
deferred planning applications which have foregone a
significant or material change since originally being
considered
(b)
resubmitted planning applications which have
foregone a significant or material change
(c)
any issues which are resubmitted to Committee in view of further
facts or information to be considered.
At a
meeting of the Development Management Committee, a person, or their
representative, may speak on a particular planning application,
provided that it is on the agenda to be considered at the
meeting.
Minutes:
Councillor Guest reminded the members and the public about the
rules regarding public participation.
The order of the agenda was changed to allow for those
applications with public speaking to be heard first. The items are
minuted in the order they were heard.
|
233. |
4/01779/17/FUL - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUNGALOW AND CONSTRUCTION OF 2 NEW SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS. CONSTRUCTION OF 7 NEW TERRACED DWELLINGS ON LAND TO THE REAR OF 50-53 CHESHAM ROAD. NEW ACCESS TO TERRACES - 50-53 CHESHAM ROAD, BOVINGDON, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 0EA PDF 499 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
N
Gibbs introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee due to the contrary views of Bovingdon Parish Council
and it had been called in by Councillor Riddick.
In
his role as ward councillor, Councillor Barrett spoke in objection
to the application.
Ian Grice spoke in support of the application.
It
was proposed by Councillor Matthews and seconded by Councillor P
Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 2
Against: 4
Abstained: 3
Having there been no majority to grant the application, it was
proposed by Councillor Riddick and seconded by Councillor Bateman
to refuse the application.
Vote
For: 5
Against: 2
Abstained: 2
Resolved:
That planning permission be REFUSED for the
following reasons:
The proposal would introduce a second tier
of housing behind the Chesham Road frontage. This backland scheme
would detract from the established character of the area, being
detrimental to the residential amenity of residents of the existing
nearby housing by reason of overlooking and overbearing visual
impact and establishing a cramped overdevelopment with the site
dominated by car parking, contrary to Policies CS11 (Quality of
Neighbourhood Design) and CS12 (Quality of Design) of the Dacorum
Core Strategy. The proposed dwellings to replace no. 50 Chesham
Road would not be served with any turning facilities to safely
enable vehicles to enter and exit in forward gear, contrary to
Policy CS12 of Dacorum Core Strategy.
|
234. |
4/03167/17/MFA - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, CONSTRUCTION OF 31 DWELLINGS, ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING VEHICULAR ACCESS ON TO AYLESBURY ROAD, LANDSCAPING AND INTRODUCTION OF INFORMAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (AMENDED SCHEME) - CONVENT OF ST FRANCIS DE SALES PREPARATORY SCHOOL, AYLESBURY ROAD, TRING, HP23 5HA PDF 899 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
I Keen introduced the item to members and said it had been
referred to the committee as a previous scheme had been previously
refused by the committee.
Bill Macleod spoke in support of the application.
It was proposed by Councillor Whitman and seconded by Councillor
P Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be DELEGATED to the
Group Manager, Development Management and Planning with a view to
approval subject to the completion of a planning obligation under
Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
2. That the
following Heads of Terms for the planning obligation, or such other
terms as the Committee may determine, be agreed:
The on-site provision of 11 affordable housing
units.
Suggested conditions:-
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2
|
Construction of the buildings hereby approved shall
commence (for the avoidance of doubt this excludes demolition and
levelling works) until details of the materials to be used in the
construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby
permitted have been submitted and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. Development shall
be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Please do not send materials to the council
offices. Materials should be kept on
site and arrangements made with the planning officer for
inspection.
Specific details of the following shall be submitted
to the local planning authority for approval and development shall
be carried out in accordance with the approved details:
·
Sample panels of brickwork;
·
Roof materials sample;
·
Detailed scaled drawing of
joinery;
·
Details of window heads and cills;
·
Rainwater goods.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in accordance
with Policy CS12 of the Dacorum Core Strategy 2013.
|
3
|
No development (excluding demolition) shall take
place until full details of both hard and soft landscape works
shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. These details shall
include:
·
hard surfacing materials;
·
means of enclosure and boundary treatments,
including area provided for communal amenity space for
flats;
·
soft landscape works which shall include planting
plans; written specifications (including cultivation and other
operations associated with plant and grass establishment);
schedules of plants, noting species, plant sizes and proposed
numbers/densities where appropriate, including offset planting
following tree removal concentrating on smaller public amenity
spaces within the development;
·
trees to be retained and measures for their
protection during construction works;
·
proposed finished levels or
contours;
·
car parking layouts and other vehicle and
pedestrian access and circulation areas;
·
full details of proposed ramps;
·
refuse and cycle areas including covered storage
and other outbuildings;
·
minor artefacts and structures (e.g. furniture,
play equipment, signs etc);
·
external lighting; ...
view the full minutes text for item 234.
|
|
235. |
4/03153/17/FUL - CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW SEMI-DETACHED THREE-BEDROOM DWELLINGS AND ASSOCIATED ACCESS - LAND TO THE REAR OF 21, 23 & 25 GROVE ROAD, TRING, HP23 5HA PDF 232 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
R
Marber introduced the item to the members and said it had been
referred to committee due to the contrary views of Tring Town
Council.
Christie Strong and Belinda Goss spoke in objection to the
application.
Christopher Higgenbottam spoke in support of the
application.
Having there been no proposer to grant this application in line
with the officer’s recommendation, it was proposed by
Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor P Hearn to overturn
the officer’s recommendation and refuse the
application.
Vote
For: 8
Against: 0
Abstained: 1
Resolved:
That planning permission be REFUSED due to the
following reasons:
-
The two proposed units by virtue of combined
width and depth in relation to insufficient external amenity space
and proximity to the boundaries of the site would result in an
unacceptable amount of bulk and mass across the site and a
significant erosion of the spacious character of the area. As a
result, the proposed dwellings would appear cramped within their
plots and would fail to maintain or enhance the quality and
character of the surrounding area. As such, the proposal would be
contrary to Policies CS11 and CS12 of the Core Strategy (2013),
NPPF and Tring Character Area Appraisal (TCA13)
(2004).
-
By virtue of the
close proximity of the proposed units to neighbouring residents at
No.1 Sinfield Place it is considered that the proposal would result
in a loss of outlook and privacy to these neighbouring residents.
Moreover, due to change in land levels, and close proximity of
neighbouring residents on Grove Road and Sinfield Place it is
considered that the proposed new units would be significantly
overlooked. The application would therefore fail to secure good
standards of amenity for existing and future occupiers of land and
buildings contrary to the provisions of Saved Appendix 3 of the
Local Plan (2004), Policy and CS12 of the Core Strategy (2013) and
the NPPF (2012).
|
236. |
4/02115/17/FUL - CONSTRUCTION OF AGRICULTURAL BUILDING AND GREENHOUSE - LAND TO THE EAST OF DELMEREND LANE, FLAMSTEAD, ST. ALBANS PDF 461 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
J
Seed introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee due to the contrary views of Flamstead Parish
Council.
Jason Opperman spoke in spoke of the application.
Members asked for a condition to be imposed that would mean the
temporary structures on site would be removed within 6 months of
the development being finished.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor
Whitman to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation and the additional condition.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
Location Plan
Site Plan
Barn Plans - Sections and Elevations
Proposed Greenhouse
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
3
|
No development (excluding groundworks) shall take
place until full details of both hard and soft landscape works
shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. These details shall
include:
·
hard surfacing materials;
·
means of enclosure;
·
soft landscape works which shall include planting
plans; written specifications (including cultivation and other
operations associated with plant and grass establishment);
schedules of plants, noting species, plant sizes and proposed
numbers/densities where appropriate;
·
trees to be retained and measures for their
protection during construction works;
·
proposed finished levels or
contours;
·
car parking layouts and other vehicle and
pedestrian access and circulation areas;
·
minor artefacts and structures (e.g. furniture,
play equipment, refuse or other storage units, signs, lighting
etc);
·
proposed and existing functional services above
and below ground (e.g. drainage, power, communications cables,
pipelines etc, indicating lines, manholes, supports
etc);
·
retained historic landscape features and
proposals for restoration, where relevant.
The approved landscape works shall be carried out
prior to the first occupation of the development hereby
permitted.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development and to
safeguard the visual character of the immediate area in accordance
with Policy CS12 of the Core Strategy.
|
4
|
Details of any external lighting shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to
installation.
Reason: To
safeguard the visual character and residential amenity of the
immediate area in accordance with Policy CS12 Core
Strategy.
|
5
|
The proposed development shall not be brought into
use until details of facilities for the storage of refuse shall
have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The approved facilities shall then be provided
before the development is first brought into use and they shall
thereafter be permanently retained unless otherwise agreed in
writing with the local ...
view the full minutes text for item 236.
|
|
237. |
4/02928/17/FHA - PROPOSED TWO-STOREY AND SINGLE STOREY SIDE EXTENSION, FIRST FLOOR REAR EXTENSION, ONE REAR AND TWO SIDE ROOF WINDOWS - 8 LITTLE GADDESDEN, BERKHAMSTED, HP4 1PA PDF 124 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
R
Marber introduced the item to members and said the application was
recommended for refusal. It had been referred to committee due to
the contrary views of Little Gaddesden Parish Council.
Christopher Higgenbottam and Lynne Lane spoke in support of the
application.
In
not accepting the officer recommendation Members carefully
evaluated the planning merits of the case and concluded that the
proposal was acceptable. Members
considered that the proposed works would not make a significant
impact on the appearance of the site and surrounding area noting
that the proposed materials would match the existing
building. It was further considered
that any harm would not be great, less than substantial, and it was
noted that there were few medium sized properties in the
village. It was considered that the
extension of the property to create a larger unit would give public
benefit to current and future occupiers of the property and wider
village community through increasing the diversity of accommodation
the village that would help to retain families in the
village.
Members felt the public benefits of the proposal outweighed any
harm to the significance of the heritage asset.
Having there been no proposer to refuse the application, it was
proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor Matthews
to overturn the officer’s recommendation and grant the
application.
Vote
For: 8
Against: 0
Abstained: 1
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
-
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To comply with the
requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the Planning and Compulsory
Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
|
-
The development hereby permitted shall be carried
out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
2107/02B
2107/03B
2107/04B
Design, Access and Heritage Statement
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
|
|
-
No development shall take place above damp proof
course until details to be used in the construction of the external
surfaces of the development hereby permitted have been submitted
and approved in writing by the local planning
authority.
The material details shall include:
Eaves;
Brickwork;
Bond;
Mortor mix;
Tiles;
Rainwater goods; and
Joinery details and finish
Please do not send materials to the council
offices. Materials should be kept on site and arrangements
made with the planning officer for inspection.
Reason: In the interests of the
visual amenities of the Conservation Area; in accordance with
Policies CS12 and CS27 of the Core Strategy (2013).
|
|
|
238. |
4/02491/17/FHA - FRONT, SIDE AND REAR EXTENSION. LOFT CONVERSION WITH CROWN ROOF AND FRONT GABLE EXTENSION - 74 SCATTERDELLS LANE, CHIPPERFIELD, KINGS LANGLEY, WD4 9EX PDF 219 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
R
Marber introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee due to the contrary views of Chipperfield Parish
Council.
Councillor Birnie questioned the presence of Japanese Knotweed
on the site. A Horner advised that it wasn’t a material
planning consideration but an informative could be added to make developers aware of its
presence.
It
was proposed by Councillor Matthews and seconded by Councillor P
Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 2
Against: 5
Abstained: 2
Having there been no majority to grant the application in line
with the officer’s recommendation, it was proposed by
Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor Bateman to overturn
the officer’s recommendation and refuse the
application.
Vote
For: 5
Against: 2
Abstained: 2
Resolved:
That planning permission be REFUSED due to the following reasons:
-
The proposed development would be
overbearing and cause significant harm to the residential amenity
of adjoining properties in terms of loss of light due to its size,
contrary to Policy CS12 c) of the Core Strategy (2013). The
proposal would result in disproportionate additions over and above
the size of the original dwelling, contrary to paragraph 89 of the
NPPF and Policy CS5 c) of the Core Strategy (2013).
-
The proposed front, side and rear extension; loft
conversion with crown roof and front gable extension are not
considered limited and will significantly increase the bulk,
massing, prominence of the property thereby failing to comply with
Policies CS5 and CS12 of the Core Strategy (2013) and the National
Planning Policy Framework (2012).
|
239. |
4/02996/17/FHA - CONSTRUCTION OF DOUBLE GARAGE WITH WOOD STORE, NEW RELOCATED GATE, FENCE AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING - THE GRANARY, CHEVERELLS GREEN, MARKYATE, ST ALBANS, AL3 8AA PDF 95 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
I
Keen introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee as the applicant was a councillor.
It
was proposed by Councillor Matthews and seconded by Councillor
Birnie to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
460S /TP-LBC / 201
460S / TP-LBC/ 202A rev.A
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
3
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
constructed in accordance with the materials specified on the
approved drawings.
Reason: To safeguard the character and
appearance of the Listed Building in accordance with Adopted Core
Strategy CS12 and CS24
Article 35 Statement
Planning permission has been granted for this proposal. The
Council acted pro-actively through positive engagement with the
applicant during the determination process which led to
improvements to the scheme. The Council has therefore acted
pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework
(paragraphs 186 and 187) and in accordance with the Town and
Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
(Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
|
|
240. |
4/02997/17/LBC - DOUBLE GARAGE WITH WOOD STORE, NEW RELOCATED GATE, LAPBOARD FENCE AND LANDSCAPING - THE GRANARY, CHEVERELLS GREEN, MARKYATE, ST ALBANS, AL3 8AA PDF 94 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
I
Keen introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee as the applicant was a councillor.
It
was proposed by Councillor Matthews and seconded by Councillor
Maddern to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
1
|
The works for which this consent is granted shall be
begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this
consent.
Reason: To
comply with section 18 of the Planning (Listed Building and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
460S /TP-LBC / 201
460S / TP-LBC/ 202A rev.A
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
Article 35 Statement
Planning permission has been granted for this proposal. The
Council acted pro-actively through positive engagement with the
applicant during the determination process which led to
improvements to the scheme. The Council has therefore acted
pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework
(paragraphs 186 and 187) and in accordance with the Town and
Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
(Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
|
|
241. |
4/03269/17/FUL - TWO STOREY AND SINGLE STOREY EXTENSIONS AND REAR DORMER TO FORM NEW DWELLING (AMENDED SCHEME) - 17 CHESTNUT DRIVE, BERKHAMSTED, HP4 2JL PDF 471 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
R
Marber introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee due to the contrary views of Berkhamsted Town
Council.
Councillor Bateman confirmed that Berkhamsted Town Council had
withdrawn its objection.
It
was proposed by Councillor Bateman and seconded by Councillor
Birnie to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission to GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
DBC / 17 /11 / 1
DBC / 17/11 / 2
DBC / 17/11 / 3A
Design and Access Statement
Application form.
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning.
|
3
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
constructed fully in accordance with the materials specified on the
approved drawings and application form.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in accordance
with Policy CS12 of the Core Strategy.
|
4
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and
Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015
(or any Order amending or re-enacting that Order with or without
modification) no development falling within the following classes
of the Order shall be carried out without the prior written
approval of the local planning authority:
Schedule 2 Part 1 Classes A
Reason: To
enable the local planning authority to retain control over the
development in the interests of safeguarding the residential and
visual amenity of the locality.
|
5
|
The additional dwelling hereby permitted shall not
be occupied until the arrangements for vehicle parking, shown on
Drawing No. DBC/17/11/2 shall have been provided, and they shall
not be used thereafter otherwise than for the purposes
approved.
Reason: To
ensure the adequate and satisfactory provision of off-street
vehicle parking facilities.
|
6
|
Pedestrian visibility splays of 2 m x 2 m shall be
provided before the new dwelling is first brought into use, and
they shall thereafter be maintained, on both sides of the entrance
to the site, within which there shall be no obstruction to
visibility between 600 mm and 2 m above the carriageway.
Reason: In the interest of highway safety;
in accordance with Policies CS8 and CS12 of the Core Strategy
(2013).
|
7
|
The gradient of the vehicular access shall not
exceed 1:10 for the first 5 metres into the site as measured from
the near channel edge of the adjacent carriageway.
Reason: In the interests of
the safety of persons using the access and users of the highway; in
accordance with Policies CS8 and CS12 of the Core Strategy
(2013).
Article 35;
Planning permission has been granted for this
proposal. ...
view the full minutes text for item 241.
|
|
242. |
4/02372/17/ROC - REMOVAL OF CONDITION 7 (RESIDENTIAL FLAT TO BE OCCUPIED BY MEMBER OF NURSERY STAFF) ATTACHED TO PLANNING PERMISSION 4/01719/13/FUL (GROUND FLOOR NURSERY WITH SINGLE STOREY SIDE AND REAR EXTENSION AND RESIDENTIAL USE OF FIRST FLOOR AS ONE BEDROOM FLAT) - STEPHENSONS COTTAGE, 306 BELSWAINS LANE, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 9XE PDF 112 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
I
Keen introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee due to the contrary views of Nash Mills Parish
Council.
It
was proposed by Councillor Whitman and seconded by Councillor
Birnie to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 7
Against: 2
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
·
The premises hereby approved shall only operate
as a day nursery between the hours of 7.30 am and 6.30 pm on
Mondays to Fridays.
Reason: In the
interests of the amenities of the occupants of neighbouring
dwellings by allowing the nursery parking spaces to be used for
residents parking outside of these hours to relieve parking
pressures in the vicinity and in compliance with Core Strategy
policy CS12.
|
|
|
·
No more than 25 children registered to attend the
day nursery hereby permitted shall be on the premises at any one
time.
Reason: To
maintain control over the impact of this use on the residential
amenities of the occupants of adjacent dwellings and by maintaining
the number of nursery parking spaces in compliance with the saved
DBLP Appendix 5.
·
The ground floor of the building shall be used
solely as a day nursery. There shall be
no other use of the ground floor premises including any other
purpose in Class D1 of the Schedule to the Town and Country
Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended by Statutory
Instrument 2005/84), or in any provision equivalent to that Class
in any statutory instrument revoking and re-enacting that Order
with or without modification.
Reason: To
maintain control over the impact of this use on the residential
amenities of the occupants of adjacent dwellings and incompliance
with Core Strategy policy CS12.
|
|
|
243. |
4/03264/17/FUL - NEW THREE BED DWELLING - 105 CHERRY ORCHARD, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP1 3NJ PDF 180 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
I
Keen introduced the item to members and said it had been referred
to committee as the applicant is a member of staff.
It
was proposed by Councillor Birnie and seconded by Councillor P
Hearn to grant the application in line with the officer’s
recommendation.
Vote
For: 9
Against: 0
Abstained: 0
Resolved:
That planning permission be GRANTED subject to
the following conditions:
1
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
before the expiration of three years from the date of this
permission.
Reason: To
comply with the requirements of Section 91 (1) of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 (1) of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2
|
The materials to be used in the construction of the
external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in
size, colour and texture those used on the existing
building.
Reason: To
ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development.
|
3
|
No development shall take place until details of all
means of enclosure within and around the site whether by means of
walls, fences or hedges shall be submitted to and approved in
writing. Such enclosures should include
any measures to prevent unauthorised access from the drive and
parking area to the public footpath to the south of the site. The
approved means of enclosure round the external boundaries of the
site shall be constructed, erected or planted prior to the
commencement of other construction work on site and the approved
means of enclosure within the site shall be constructed, erected or
planted at the same time as the buildings to which it relates are
constructed.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory
appearance to the development and to assist in the prevention of
crime in accordance with policies CS12 and CS13 of the Core
Strategy.
|
4
5
|
The development hereby permitted shall be
carried out in accordance with the following approved
plans/documents:
PL001
PL002
PL003
PL004
Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper
planning
The development, hereby permitted, shall not commence
until a drive specification has been submitted to and approved in
writing by the local planning authority. This specification shall
set out details of the materials to be used in its construction,
gradient and any surface water drainage system. The access and
drive shall be provided in accordance with the approved details
prior to occupation and shall be thereafter be
retained.
Reason: In the
interests of highways and pedestrian safety.
Article 31
Planning permission has been granted for this proposal.
Discussion with the applicant to seek an acceptable solution was
not necessary in this instance. The Council has therefore acted
pro-actively in line with the requirements of the Framework
(paragraphs 186 and 187) and in accordance with the Town and
Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England)
(Amendment No. 2) Order 2015.
|
|
244. |
Appeals PDF 121 KB
Minutes:
The following appeals were noted:
-
Lodged
-
Forthcoming hearings
-
Dismissed
-
Allowed
|